对于雅思写作还没有头绪的同学，可以借鉴以下这篇来自牛津学生的范文，让我们一起来分析一下这篇作文准确的词汇、多样的句型以及层次。以下是个人对照原文所翻的译文，希望对大家的理解有所帮助：
It is right that college graduates earn higher salaries than the less well-educated in the community. But they should also pay the full cost of their study. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
大学毕业生比受教育程度相对较少的人挣得多似乎是正确的，但是他们也应该支付他们学习的全部费用，你赞成此观点吗？
Some conclude that college students should bear knowledge expenses for their higher learning on the generalization that college graduates usually receive higher salaries for similar jobs than those without a college degree. We can not deny that higher level of education, indeed, do associate with better income. Still, build on such fact alone, the conclusion remains questionable when more aspects are taken into consideration.
有些人总结说，大学生应该承担自己高等教育学习知识的支出，总体来说，即使做同样的工作，大学毕业生与那些没有大学文凭的人相比还是会得到更高的工资。我们不能否认的是，实际上，更高层次的教育与高收入是有联系的，但是如果是单独的事实为基础，当考虑到更多方面的因素时，以上结论其实还是不可靠的。
The whole argument in question rests on an assumption that it is always the case that people with higher education make more money than those less well-educated. But salary or income is, in most cases, based on contributions made by employees to companies or organizations in which they are employed. Statistics in the labor market indicate that people with professional training tend to find jobs easier than college graduates do and that blue-collar workers who do not hold college degrees are becoming the hotties in the labor market. Employers prefer to hire and pay more to highly skilled and specially trained people rather than fresh college graduates. In the auto industry, for instance, skilled technicians make two or three times more than their college educated counterparts who make the average salaries in other companies. And it is widely accepted that people's income is determined more by talent, hard work, and willingness to take risks than solely by certain qualifications such as college education. Otherwise, the unemployment rate of college graduates would not be increasing every year and the rule of supply and demand will lose much of power in controlling the labor market. Admittedly in some knowledge extensive field such as research, teaching, and practice of law the labor force are primarily consists of highly educated professionals. But such people make up only a fraction of the labor market and are thus unrepresentative of the whole employment in general.
问题中的整个论点就在于一个假设，那就是受过更高教育的人总是比受教育程度相对较低的人挣得更多，但不论是工资或者收入，都是依据员对于自己所受雇佣的公司或团体所做的贡献而得出的。来自劳动力市场的统计数据显示，受过专业培训的求职者倾向于比大学毕业生更容易找到工作，而没有大学文凭的蓝领工人在劳动力市场也成为“抢手货”。雇佣者们更喜欢聘用并且向那些技术精湛以及受过专门培训的求职者而不是应届大学毕业生支付更高的工资。以汽车行业为例，熟练的技术人员挣得的收入比那些在其他公司挣平均工资的同仁多两三倍。人们的收入更多地取决于才能、努力程度以及承担风险的意愿，而不是只通过某种资格认证比如大学教育来决定的观点已经被广泛接受。否则，大学毕业生的失业率也就不会每年都在增加，并且供需规则在调节劳动力市场方面也会失去大部分权利。诚然，在一些知识应用比较广泛的领域，比如科研、教学以及法律实践方面劳动力主要是由高学历的专门人才组成，但这部分人也只是占据了整个劳动力市场的一小部分，因此也就不能代表总体的雇佣情况。
Considering the goal of education, we find that it is even more problematic for the country to throw all the responsibility of financing college education to college students. The goal of higher education of a nation is to improve and strengthen the general level of intellectual and professional capacity of its labor force, thereby increasing the competency of the nation in the global economy. As tax payers, parents all contributes to the education system and country in various ways. It is only reasonable and necessary that the country gives some forms of financially assistance to students to ease the burden of rising education costs. Such help should go to not only students from needy or impoverished families but also outstanding students from affluent backgrounds. Doing so can significantly boost the motivation of children from millions of families to engage in higher level of study. It is understandable that the general quality of people in a country will improve and its economy will benefit both now and in years to follow.
考虑到教育的目标，我们发现，如果国家把为高等教育负担经费的所有责任推到大学生身上，问题甚至会更严重。一个国家进行高等教育的目标是改善和提高劳动力的智力及专业能力的总体水平，从而提高本国在全球经济中的竞争力。作为纳税人，所有父母都将收入以各种方式贡献给了教育系统和国家。因而，国家给学生一些财政援助已减轻教育成本上升带来的压力是合理而且必须的，这种帮助不应该只给来自贫困或特困家庭的学生，也应该提供给来自富裕家庭的优秀学生。这样做可以显著提高万千家庭的孩子的学习动力，使他们致力于更高水平的研究。那么，无论是现在还是将来，一个国家的人民的总体质量就会提高，其经济就会受益，就不难理解了。
If the burden of supporting children's higher education is dumped on parents and students, thousands of brilliant students will be deprived of chances to pursue their academic inspiration. Among those who suffer would definitely be future great scientists,business managers, artists and statesmen. The loss will be disastrous and irreversible.
如果支付孩子高等教育的负担落到父母和学生自己的身上，成千上万的优秀学子将会被剥夺了追求自己学术灵感的机会了。在这些优秀学子中，肯定有未来的伟大科学家、企业管理者、艺术家和政治家，如果他们遭受了损失，那么损失将会是灾难性的和不可逆转的。
In conclusion, the idea that students should also pay the full cost of their study is wrong and harmful because it is wrong to assume that higher education necessarily equalize high income. Moreover, it is in the best interest of a nation to take responsibility in financing college education so that the goal of higher education will be better met.
总之，学生应该支付自己学习全部费用的说法是错误的和有害的，因为高等教育一定会等于高收入的假设就是错误的。此外，一个国家履行为大学教育负担财政的职责是最好的方式，这样将能够更好地实现高等教育的目标。
相关知识
牛津学生的9分雅思作文剖析
青岛新东方雅思留学直通车给了我信心
用朴素的语言进行雅思写作
青岛新东方雅思寒假班报名火爆
雅思学习方法之雅思考试得高分的三大要素
结构的重要性―青岛新东方名师点评雅思大作文
青岛新东方雅思中心 2012雅思考试预测与展望
细节决定成败 雅思喜获7.5分
青岛新东方雅思高分学员心得：雅思8分考试回忆
麦考瑞雅思：上海最严格、最认真的雅思学校